It is with some envy when I went through the cover story on today’s Straits Times – “Property agents to be regulated”.
And I wondered, if there ever would come a day for interior designers to be taken seriously enough for the industry to be regulated as well. It’s not that I’m a professional designer who knows the ins and outs of the industry at my fingertips but after you’ve been a few trade parties and networking sessions, you start hearing the same grouses after a while.
It’s usually about “designers” who over promise and under deliver, “designers” who think they are designers by buying a chair and putting it in some corner of the room and “designers” who take a picture out of a magazine and engages a “designer” to build the idea for them just because it looks “nice”.
It’s certainly sexy these days to be called a designer eh?
Professional designers – the ones i’ve spoken to – are certainly not too happy about the promiscuous use of the designation.
And you know, apparently, this isn’t just a Singapore phenomenon.
While browsing through the net for one of our speaker’s, Shashi Caan, details. I came across this article published in 2005 with her lamenting about her profession not being taken seriously. “There is someone like me who has three degrees and is passionate about the interior, wanting and struggling to improve it. This other person who has no training can be sitting with me at the same table.”
Sounds frustratingly familiar already?
The odd thing is, even though most professional designers complain about the state of the industry, the murmurs just aren’t loud enough for an industry overhaul.
Too complacent? Too comfortable?
Nah… it’s probably about being too busy to meet the deadline for tomorrow’s pitching exercise. Eh?